Investors in DeFi Technologies May Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit

Investors with losses may join a securities fraud class action alleging undisclosed delays in DeFi arbitrage, understated competition, and misstatements on 2025 revenue.

Rich by Coin

2026-01-13

Investors with losses related to DeFi Technologies Inc. have the opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit. Investors must act before January 30, 2026 to participate in the ongoing securities fraud lawsuit. The complaint filed alleges that, between May 12, 2025 and November 14, 2025, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that DeFi was facing delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which at all relevant times was a key revenue driver for the Company. DeFi had understated the extent of competition it faced from other DAT companies and the extent to which that competition would negatively impact its ability to execute its DeFi arbitrage strategy.

As a result of the foregoing issues, the Company was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025. Accordingly, Defendants had downplayed the true scope and severity of the negative impact that the foregoing issues were having on DeFi Technologies’ business and financial results. Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Investors with losses related to DeFi Technologies Inc. have the opportunity to participate in a securities fraud class action. They must act before January 30, 2026 to participate in the ongoing lawsuit. The complaint alleges that, between May 12, 2025 and November 14, 2025, defendants failed to disclose to investors that DeFi was facing delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which at all relevant times was a key revenue driver for the company. DeFi had understated the extent of competition it faced from other DAT companies and the degree to which that competition would negatively impact its ability to execute the DeFi arbitrage strategy.

As a result of these issues, the company was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for fiscal 2025. Accordingly, Defendants downplayed the true scope and severity of the negative impact on DeFi Technologies’ business and financial results. Defendants’ positive statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects were said to be materially misleading and lacking a reasonable basis at all relevant times.